Full Text
2040 MTP Update Public Outreach Results Farmington MPO Technical Committee November 20, 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- What is the MTP? β’ Each MPO is tasked with developing and updating a Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). β’ Long range planning document (~25 years) β Consistency with Federal and State requirements β Regional planning β Multiple modes of travel, transportation policies and related factors Plan elements or chapters β Vision, goals, objectives, plans and implementation β Financial plan, βfiscally constrainedβ ---PAGE BREAK--- How is input used? β’ 2040 MTP Update β Input informs plan elements β Input to help identify project needs and public priorities β Learn βon the groundβ details about use of the transportation system β Learn positives and negatives β Hear perspectives of many groups ---PAGE BREAK--- Results to present β’ Methods for outreach β’ Who participated? β’ Key findings β’ Maps, tables, etc. β’ Recommendations of consultant β’ Please note, results are posted to website: farmingtonmpo.org, and select Metropolitan Transportation Plan, scroll to document links ---PAGE BREAK--- Methods for Outreach β’ January and February 2014 β Stakeholder meetings β Public meetings of local govβt β’ August and September 2014 β Online survey and mapping tool β Paper version with map β Public open houses (6 during evenings) β Small group interviews (8 during days) β By invitation (CHIC, Fmtn Rotary, Place Matters) β’ Consultant: Sites Southwest, REgeneration Strategies, and MIG, Inc. ---PAGE BREAK--- Who Participated? β’ Participation by general public, stakeholder groups, local govβt staff, elected officials β’ Advertised through newspaper ads, e-mail, website, phone calls, radio interview, SJ County Fair booth ---PAGE BREAK--- Who Participated? β’ Approx. 466 participants in the region β’ 306 online survey and mapping responses β’ Approx. 40 at daytime stakeholder group meetings and evening public open houses β’ 55 paper survey responses. β’ Approx. 65 participants at meetings of stakeholder groups ---PAGE BREAK--- Topics from public meetings Week 1- Aug. 19-21 San Juan College MPO Office Aztec-SJC- East MPO Office- AM MPO Office- PM Sycamore Pk CC Missing Connections (roads, bikeways, paths) β β β β β β Limited Walkability β β β β β β Recreational Trails β β β β β Regional Access β β β β β Limited Transit β β β β β Rail Service β β β β β Funding β β β β β Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety β β β β Aesthetics/Quality of Life β β β β Insufficient North-South roads β β β Wayfinding β β β Airport Service β β Hwy Lane Markings/ Streetlights β β Economic Development β β Pinon Hills Bridge β β Tourism East Main Street Congestion β Bus Stop Amenities β ---PAGE BREAK--- Topics from public meetings ---PAGE BREAK--- Map with Paper Survey ---PAGE BREAK--- From online survey β’ Keep in mind: β Not all people answered each question β Some questions people could select more than one option β A lot of this has comments behind it ---PAGE BREAK--- Home Location ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Destinations near Home ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Work Location ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Destinations near Work ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Locations of Ideas for Improvements Most often located around respondentβs home ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Transportation Improvement Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- Routes to Work and School ---PAGE BREAK--- Ideas for Connections of Various Modes ---PAGE BREAK--- Locations of Positives ---PAGE BREAK--- Location of Problems ---PAGE BREAK--- Routes to Work and School ---PAGE BREAK--- Priorities and Willingness to Pay ---PAGE BREAK--- Priorities and Willingness to Pay ---PAGE BREAK--- Priorities and Willingness to Pay ---PAGE BREAK--- Demographic Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Demographic Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Themes & Observations β’ Pedestrian and bike safety AND filling in missing bike and sidewalk networks are high priorities, people are willing to pay for. β’ Major roads are seen as higher priority than smaller connecting roads β’ The most often mentioned is PHB bridge, and congestion on East Main in Farmington β’ Local trails are higher priority than regional trails, trails received praise, need to continue trying to connect cities to river trail networks ---PAGE BREAK--- Themes & Observations β’ Bus service is high priority to those who use it and low priority to those who don't β’ But stakeholder groups point out need β San Juan College β Bloomfield lost clinic and doctors β Dial-a-Ride is booked β Limited other options β Senior Centers and Disabled Veterans needs β Need connection between Aztec & Bloomfield β People would say, βbetter than what we had, but could be better.β β Encouraging discussion with Asst. City Mgr. in Farmington about study and the ways to improve the system β Some talk about improving partnerships ---PAGE BREAK--- Themes & Observations β’ Roundabouts: majority of respondents in favor β They slow traffic down β Keep it moving β’ People feel getting into and out of area is problem β Air service β Alternatives to driving your own car β’ Freight: rail connection and truck route use by large trucks ---PAGE BREAK--- Themes & Observations β’ Aesthetics of roadways is factor for quality of life and attracting tourists and new residents β’ We have done well designing for drivers, that works well, for most part ---PAGE BREAK--- Elements to add β’ Project Prioritization Methodology (FHWA review of 2012) β Prioritize projects β Demonstrate consistency with identified goals β Quantitative and qualitative β’ Performance Measures (MAP-21, federal transportation law) β Federal, State and local measures β Quantitative and qualitative or descriptive β Need to establish baseline β Need to find ways to measure ---PAGE BREAK--- Going Forward β’ This is an update, and we have key elements that need to be added β’ Approx. 15 chapters (plan elements) β’ Chapters will be presented during January, February, March β’ Goal of final adoption in April 2015